<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barn Owl Nursery rated &#8220;satisfactory&#8221; by Ofsted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bradleystokejournal.co.uk/plus/2010/08/26/barn-owl-nursery-rated-satisfactory-ofsted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bradleystokejournal.co.uk/plus/2010/08/26/barn-owl-nursery-rated-satisfactory-ofsted/</link>
	<description>News and views from the town of Bradley Stoke, South Gloucestershire.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 06:23:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: SH (Editor)</title>
		<link>http://www.bradleystokejournal.co.uk/plus/2010/08/26/barn-owl-nursery-rated-satisfactory-ofsted/comment-page-1/#comment-3596</link>
		<dc:creator>SH (Editor)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradleystokejournal.co.uk/plus/?p=701#comment-3596</guid>
		<description>This article was based on the content of a report published on the Ofsted website on 30th July 2010. Ofsted subsequently re-published the report on 26th August 2010 and (for a second time) on 22nd October 2010. In the latter report, which can be viewed by following the link in the article, the overall rating for the nursery is now &quot;good&quot; and some of the comments about areas needing improvements have been changed. We contacted Ofsted on 22nd October 2010 to ask why the report had been revised following its first publication but are yet to receive a reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was based on the content of a report published on the Ofsted website on 30th July 2010. Ofsted subsequently re-published the report on 26th August 2010 and (for a second time) on 22nd October 2010. In the latter report, which can be viewed by following the link in the article, the overall rating for the nursery is now &#8220;good&#8221; and some of the comments about areas needing improvements have been changed. We contacted Ofsted on 22nd October 2010 to ask why the report had been revised following its first publication but are yet to receive a reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

